sharing means having morewho pays for it after the grant?
144 development interventions that tried to get beyond the grant: 120 that lasted, 23 that stalled, every one of them sourced. Sorted by the question a funder actually asks: who paid next, what did that payer need to see, and what went wrong for the others.
three things 144 cases tell us
which proofs do you already have?
Every payer in this library wanted to see something specific before saying yes. Five questions, no email required, and you get the routes that fit what you can show today.
who pays next
Pick the payer you could realistically reach. Each route shows how often it lasted or stalled in this library, what that payer needed to see, and the cases to read. In this library most lasting cases rely on one main payer; the stalled ones were more often juggling several.
what 144 cases tell us
These are patterns in a curated library, not findings about the whole sector. They are still the most useful thing to read before you promise a board that a programme will carry itself.
what went wrong
models that show up most in the stalled cases
sectors with the most stalls
A model appearing here does not make it a bad model. Users-pay models are the most common in the library, so they are the most common in the stalls too. Read the case to see what actually broke.
Sharing means having more. If you have watched a programme find its payers, or watched one stall, we want it in here with your name on it if you like. We ask for the facts and for sources we can check; the Peak Nine team reads every submission, checks the evidence, and publishes the ones that hold up.
- 1Tell us the organisation, the country and what the intervention does.
- 2Say who pays for it now, which models it uses, and which proofs it has evidence for.
- 3Describe what happened to the money over time, including what did not work.
- 4Give at least two public sources with dates: reports, evaluations, financials, press.
- 5Leave your name and email so we can come back with questions and credit you.
what we check before it goes live
- Sources are public and dated. A press release counts; a memory does not.
- Figures match the sources, and the entry says which year they are from.
- The story includes the hard part: the dip, the funder that left, the pilot that stalled.
- Payer, models and proof points are tagged the way the rest of the library is.